UKBA Policies on Business Immigration Unlawful


<1 min

Posted on 20 Nov 2012

The Supreme Court has ruled that aspects of UK Border Agency policies on business immigration are unlawful.

In Alvi v SSHD it was argued before the Supreme Court that aspects of UKBA policies on business immigration were unlawful. It was claimed that they had not been laid before Parliament before coming into effect. The Supreme Court agreed that any policies, guidance or such like which could determine an applicant’s rights to remain in the country were, in effect, Immigration Rules and should be laid before Parliament prior to taking effect.

In response to the case, the Home Office chose to pass additional Immigration Rules very quickly to rectify the position. Consequently, these sections now contain numerous errors and are confusing in parts. The overall significance of this case is that the new rules could open the government up to an enormous number of legal challenges, not only from working migrants, but also from family migrants and others.

The articles published on this website, current at the date of publication, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your own circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.