Redundancy: The importance of consultation

1 min

Posted on 29 Nov 2010

The case of Pinewood Repro Ltd T/A County Print v Page confirms the importance of effective redundancy consultation. 

Pinewood was found to have failed to conduct an adequate or effective consultation with Mr Page as they did not provide him with an adequate explanation of why he had received lower scores than the two other people in the redundancy pool.  Furthermore, Pinewood did not allow Mr Wood the opportunity to comment meaningfully on his score. The EAT commented that this will be key, particularly if the criteria and the scores awarded are subjective. 

The employer argued that there was a chance that had there been a fair consultation, Mr Wood would still have been dismissed and that his compensation should have been reduced accordingly. The EAT considered that it was insufficient to present such an argument without cogent evidence. 

The articles published on this website, current at the date of publication, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your own circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.

Back to top