Changes to UK Corporate Governance Code Confirmed

2 mins

Posted on 22 Sep 2014

Following its consultation earlier this year, the Financial Reporting Council has issued a feedback statement setting out revisions to the UK Corporate Governance Code.

Changes include:

  • Changing main principle D.1 on the level and components of remuneration to make it clear that remuneration policies must be designed to deliver long-term benefit to the company. This now states that “Executive directors’ remuneration should be designed to promote the long-term success of the company. Performance-related elements should be transparent, stretching and rigorously applied”. The FRC expects companies to set and report on targets that do not encourage excessive risk-taking and over which remuneration committees have effective control; 
  • Requiring companies, when designing performance-related remuneration schemes, to put in place arrangements that will enable them to claw back or withhold variable pay when appropriate to do so;
  • When a significant proportion of votes have been cast against a resolution, requiring companies to explain when announcing the result what actions they intend to take to understand the reasons behind the vote result; 
  • Changes to schedule A (which deals with the design of performance-related remuneration) including:
    • A change in terminology in the first section to require remuneration committees to determine an appropriate balance between “fixed and performance-related” remuneration as it was felt this covered all types of remuneration;
    • Dividing it into three sections: balance between immediate and deferred remuneration; share-based remuneration schemes; and pensions.  

The Code applies to companies with a premium listing of equity shares. The changes will apply to reporting periods beginning on or after 1 October 2014.   The revised UK Corporate Governance Code can be viewed here.

The articles published on this website, current at the date of publication, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your own circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.

Back to top