The Apprentice - Episode Ten – Lawyer’s Summary
The Apprentice - Series 11, Episode 10 - 10 December - The latest instalment of Chloe Harrold's column for The HR Director
This week the teams were asked to create, brand and pitch a health food snack.
Versatile decided to make a bar. Charleine Wain’s research suggested that superfoods were the way to go. The anti-oxidant properties of the ingredients was a highlight, as was “nature’s viagra”, maca. Charleine, that means it might help conception - not to be confused with contraception.
Unfortunately Charleine’s failure to pay attention to the quantities of each ingredient meant that their product was a flop. Told that they had to remove the claim “high in anti-oxidants” from the packaging, it was astounding to see Charleine lie so blatantly in a pitch, claiming the bars have “extra large doses of anti-oxidants”. How embarrassing when in the next breath she had to explain what was crossed off the packaging.
Charleine and Gary Poulton then told Joseph Valente not to mention the negative feedback he’d received from his research. Joseph was uncomfortable about this, the only positive comments concerned the name of the product. Under pressure from his manager, he told the retail panel consumers “thought the product was amazing”.
False advertising is a criminal act. An employee concerned about their employer doing something unlawful, could turn whistle-blower, and attract significant protection from any resultant detriment or dismissal.
Connexus seemed to have a viable product: catchy packaging, a raw, vegetable crisp with an innovative production method. Then along came the oil and the absence of two key selling points from the packaging - raw and dehydrated. An oily health food product with no obvious USP? The retailers were left unimpressed.
Connexus took information away which could have helped them sell, while Versatile lied about their product. Neither of them secured any sales and both teams saw members in the boardroom. In a real life employment situation I think Gary and Charleine would have been on my hit list – putting their employer at risk of criminal prosecution and creating a whistleblower.
Ultimately it was Brett Butler-Smythe who was at the business end of Lord Sugar’s finger of doom. His verbose pitches without much substance behind them ended his Apprentice journey, leaving us with those immortal words: “the oil content is just to base the constitution of the chip, natural ingredients, give us the calibration of the ratios to the amounts of what we could incorporate into the chips”. Hmm, clear as mud.
Interview stage next week – it’s what we’ve all been waiting for!
The articles published on this website, current at the date of publication, are for reference purposes only. They do not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Specific legal advice about your own circumstances should always be sought separately before taking any action.